home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- THEATER, Page 75Dimming Shakespeare's Glories
-
-
- Briton Kenneth Branagh bows in Los Angeles, with mixed results
- By WILLIAM A. HENRY III
-
-
- When Britain's new and little-known Renaissance troupe was
- booked to play King Lear and A Midsummer Night's Dream at the
- Mark Taper Forum in Los Angeles, the nine-week run sold out
- before the first preview. The draw: the U.S. stage debut of the
- company's founder, Kenneth Branagh, 28. His gutsy current film
- of Henry V has won him comparison to Orson Welles and Laurence
- Olivier. As he did in the film, Branagh onstage would triple
- as impresario, director and star -- with the fillip of
- featuring his wife of five months, Emma Thompson, as
- Midsummer's willowy Helena and Lear's gnarled Fool. Despite the
- troupe's alphabetical billing, what was on offer was plainly
- a star turn.
-
- The productions opened last week and once again proved
- Branagh an artist of unrivaled promise but unfinished growth.
- As a performer he was the most confident and compelling figure
- onstage without hogging attention. As a director he showed a
- keen and kindly sense of humor, recurrent sparks of visual and
- literary imagination and a solid gift for getting a story told.
- But the company he guided was uneven and, worse, unsubtle.
- There were almost no quiet moments of insight into the
- characters' souls. It would be hard to imagine better, more
- accessible productions for audiences seeing the plays for the
- first time or duller, more disappointing ones for playgoers who
- know the texts well. Perhaps that is why reviewers tended to
- be regretful while audiences in Los Angeles, which does not
- have much of a Shakespeare tradition, chortled and cheered.
-
- The deeper problem in Branagh's approach of demythologizing
- the plays and diminishing their epic heroes to shopkeeper scale
- -- as he also determinedly does in the film Henry V -- is that
- he tends to conceal or cut out the glories that make
- Shakespeare unique. Lear, for example, drops much of the
- high-flown language and reduces the former King's mad scenes
- in the storm and at Dover from symphonies to single brief
- movements. As played by Richard Briers, this is no autumnal
- monarch but a mediocre middle manager peevishly protesting his
- pink slip.
-
- On the positive side, Branagh's stress on ensemble acting
- makes an interesting case for the play as a portrait of a whole
- society gone rotten rather than as a personal tragedy. His own
- portrayal of Edgar, the fugitive son of a mistrustful lord,
- comes as close as an actor can to making sense of the play's
- parallel set of antic mad scenes and willful disguises.
-
- Midsummer is radical chiefly in its frivolousness. Where
- during the past two decades Peter Brook and other directors
- found dark depths of class and sexual conflict, Branagh
- rediscovers airy-fairy folly and anything-for-a-laugh delight.
- Freud has nothing to do with this version. Its inspiration is
- more on the order of Me and My Girl, and the song-and-dance
- finale was actually staged by that show's choreographer,
- Gillian Gregory.
-
- In another sly reversal the nobles all play over the top,
- while the workingmen show quiet dignity. As Peter Quince,
- Branagh resembles a silent clown a la Jacques Tati -- even when
- speaking -- while Briers gives the oafish Bottom genuine
- intelligence and charm. Alas, these innovations are more
- interesting to ponder later than to watch; they squash the best
- jokes. Thompson contributes a memorably frantic Helena. Yet the
- main virtue of seeing these productions is collector's value
- for the future. Branagh is off to a spectacular start, but it
- is only a start.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-